Safety

Everything you need to know about the safety of your FaceFocusVR kit.
Unsure about anything safety related? Join the Discord

Overview

Your Responsibility

No optical safety evaluation can account for all possible real-world use conditions. Infrared radiation is a natural component of environmental light exposure; however, excessive exposure to high-intensity optical sources may cause harm.

Never attempt to replace, disable, or modify safety-related components.
Discontinue use if visual discomfort occurs.

When to Stop

If you notice any unusual warmth or discomfort in your eyes, stop using the device. Minor warmth may be perceived depending on operating conditions. Discontinue use if you experience:

The eye-tracking camera image appears overexposed or washed out.
Dark spots in your vision or unusual visual disturbances.
Dry or strained eyes beyond what is normal for VR use.

Lab Tested

Exempt Group

EN 62471:2008

Independently tested by a third-party laboratory under EN 62471 (Photobiological Safety of Lamps and Lamp Systems) and classified in the Exempt Group, the lowest of the four risk groups the standard defines.

More information

The result

The FFVR-INDEX-V2 was classified in the Exempt Group for every hazard category evaluated, for both illuminated modules, at both distances it was tested at.

EN 62471 sorts optical sources into four photobiological risk groups, ordered from lowest to highest risk: Exempt, Risk Group 1 (Low Risk), Risk Group 2 (Moderate Risk) and Risk Group 3 (High Risk). Exempt is the lowest category the standard defines. A source lands there when it poses no photobiological hazard under any of the exposure conditions the standard evaluates, without needing a time limit or a warning label to stay safe.

However, a laboratory classification describes a device under defined test conditions. It is not a guarantee of safety under every possible real-world condition, and it is no substitute for sensible use. Always follow the safety notes at the top of this page.

What was tested, and how

Device: Eye & Face Tracking Kit for Valve Index, model FFVR-INDEX-V2
Components evaluated: the eye module and the face module. The left and right eye modules are identical in construction and driven by the same circuit, so the reports evaluate the single eye-module design.
Emitters: ROHM CSL1501RW1 in the eye module (860 nm peak) and XINGLIGHT XL-3216HIRC-850 in the face module (850 nm peak), both emitting continuously rather than in pulses
Standard: EN 62471:2008, Photobiological Safety of Lamps and Lamp Systems
Laboratory: Shenzhen Southern LCS Compliance Testing Co., Ltd.
Measurement system: EVERFINE OST-300 optical radiation safety test system
Operating conditions: DC 5 V supply, stable ambient of 25 ± 1 °C, and LED forward currents of 6.06 mA in the eye module and 9.1 mA in the face module

Why it was tested at two distances

EN 62471 reports hazard values at a fixed distance. For sources that are not general lighting service lamps, that distance is 200 mm. It is a reporting convention rather than a claim about how a product is used: fixing the distance is what allows results from different products to be compared on equal terms.

A headset does not sit 200 mm from the eye. The eye-module illuminators are roughly 15 mm away, well inside the standard’s reference distance, so a report at 200 mm alone would describe a configuration that never occurs in normal use. The hardware was therefore submitted twice:

At 200 mm, the standard’s reference distance. The configuration EN 62471 specifies, which makes the result directly comparable to any other product tested against the standard. Report LCSB03236073S, tested April 16, 2026.
At 15 mm, the actual operating distance. The distance at which the modules sit from the eye in normal use, recorded in the report as a customer-specified test distance. Report LCSB07106047S, tested July 24, 2026.

How close is too close?

The limit that governs an infrared source of this type is $E_{IR}$, the infrared irradiance reaching the eye. EN 62471 caps it at $100 \frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}$ for exposures longer than 1000 s, the regime every VR session falls into. At the operating distance the reading is:

Eye module at 15 mm: $0.19 \frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}$, a factor of 530 below the limit

Having the same hardware measured at two distances makes it possible to extrapolate further inward. The emission turns out to fall off far more gently than a single point source would, because the illuminators are several separate emitters spread around the lens. Assuming the steeper inverse-square falloff regardless is therefore the conservative way to extrapolate, and that is what the figure below uses. It remains an extrapolation rather than a measurement: the reports state no measurement uncertainty, and LED binning and forward current vary between individual units.

Even on that pessimistic basis, the eye module would not reach the limit until roughly 0.65 mm from an emitter. That distance cannot occur in practice. The module housing holds the illuminators at their operating distance of about 15 mm and the eye cannot move inside it, so there is no position a wearer can reach where infrared exposure comes close to the limit.

The full reports

Basics

Infrared (IR) radiation is commonly used in eye-tracking systems to illuminate the eye without being visible to the human eye. While IR radiation is a natural part of our environment (approximately 50% of solar radiation is infrared), prolonged or excessive exposure can be harmful, particularly to sensitive areas like the eyes.

To ensure safe use, guidelines have been established that define exposure limits based on factors such as the affected body part (e.g., eye, skin), the wavelength of the radiation, and the duration of exposure. My safety assessment is primarily based on two authoritative sources:

The ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) is an independent organization that provides scientifically backed guidelines on the health effects of non-ionizing radiation, including infrared. Their exposure limits are widely recognized and used internationally.

EN 62471 is a European standard that provides detailed criteria for evaluating the photobiological safety of optical radiation sources. It specifies exposure thresholds to prevent thermal and photochemical damage to the eyes and skin.

These sources form the foundation of my calculations, design decisions, and safety precautions, which are designed to keep IR exposure from the system well below the applicable exposure limits. Since the content and limits of both references are essentially identical, only the EN 62471 standard will be explained in detail below. The ICNIRP sources are cited without further elaboration.

EN 62471

EN 62471 evaluates photobiological hazards from optical radiation in the range of 200-3000 nm. In the context of this project, continuous infrared exposure at approximately 860 nm for more than 10 seconds is relevant, specifically involving thermal hazards to the retina, thermal effects on the lens, and thermal damage to the skin.

Infrared radiation hazard exposure limits for the eye

IR radiation can be absorbed by the outer and inner structures of the eye, including the cornea and lens, leading to localized heating. Since IR radiation is invisible and does not trigger natural protective reflexes, the eye is particularly vulnerable to unintentional overexposure. For exposure durations longer than 1000 seconds, EN 62471 sets strict irradiance limits to prevent acute thermal injury and minimize long-term degenerative effects like cataractogenesis:

To avoid thermal injury of the cornea and possible delayed effects upon the lens of the eye (cataractogenesis), ocular exposure to infrared radiation, $E_{IR}$, over the wavelength range 780 nm to 3000 nm, for times greater than 1000 s, shall not exceed [EN 62471 4.3.7]:
$$E_{IR} = \sum_{780}^{3000} E_{\lambda} \times \Delta \lambda \leq 100 \quad \left[\frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}\right] \quad \text{for } (t > 1000 \text{ s})$$$$E_{IR} \leq 100 \frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2} = 10 \frac{\text{mW}}{\text{cm}^2} \quad \text{for } (t > 1000 \text{ s})$$
Where:
$E_{\lambda}$ is the spectral irradiance,
$\Delta \lambda$ is the bandwidth,
$t$ is the exposure duration,
$E_{IR}$ is the infrared irradiance (total IR radiation power per unit area over the wavelength range 780-3000 nm).

Retinal thermal hazard exposure limit (weak visual stimulus)

Unlike the general radiation limits that primarily address thermal effects on the front parts of the eye, the retinal thermal hazard exposure limit focuses on the risk of damage to the retina caused by infrared radiation. Even when the visual stimulus is weak or barely noticeable, the radiation can be concentrated onto the retina, causing localized heating and potential injury. Because the retina is particularly sensitive to temperature increases, EN 62471 establishes strict exposure limits for short durations to protect retinal cells from irreversible thermal damage.

For an infrared heat lamp or any near-infrared source where a weak visual stimulus is inadequate to activate the aversion response; the near infrared (780 nm to 1400 nm) radiance, $L_{IR}$, as viewed by the eye for exposure times greater than 10 s shall be limited to [EN 62471 4.3.6]:
$$L_{IR} = \sum_{780}^{1400} L_{\lambda} \times R(\lambda) \times \Delta \lambda \leq \frac{6000}{\alpha} \quad \left[\frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2 \cdot \text{sr}}\right] \quad \text{for } (t > 10 \text{ s})$$
Where:
$L$ is the spectral radiance,
$R(\lambda)$ is the burn hazard weighting function,
$\Delta \lambda$ is the bandwidth in nm,
$t$ is the exposure time in seconds,
$\alpha$ is the angular subtense in radians.

Thermal hazard exposure limit for the skin

In addition to ocular safety, EN 62471 also addresses the risk of thermal injury to the skin caused by prolonged exposure to infrared radiation. Since the skin can absorb IR radiation over a broad area, excessive exposure may lead to surface heating, burns, or long-term tissue damage. However, for exposure durations exceeding 10 seconds over larger areas, the standard notes that pain is typically perceived before any actual tissue damage occurs. As a result, an individual's natural aversion response due to discomfort generally limits exposure well before injury is possible. For this reason, thermal hazard exposure limits for the skin are not further considered.

[...] exposure limit is based on skin injury due to a rise in tissue temperature and applies only to small area irradiation. Exposure limits for periods greater than 10 s are not provided. Severe pain occurs below the skin temperature required for skin injury, and an individual's exposure normally will be limited for comfort. Large area irradiation and heat stress are not evaluated since this involves consideration of heat exchange between the individual and the environment, physical activity, and various other factors, which cannot be applied in a product safety standard, but must be evaluated by environmental heat-stress criteria. [EN 62471 4.3.8 (Note)]

ICNIRP

ICNIRP, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, is an independent organization that provides scientific guidance on the health effects of non-ionizing radiation, including infrared. In its 2006 and 2013 publications, ICNIRP addresses exposure limits and potential health impacts. The 2006 paper, ICNIRP Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Broad-Band Incoherent Optical Radiation (2006), includes the relevant skin exposure limit in formula 4b on page 639 (or page 11 of the document). The 2013 paper, ICNIRP Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Incoherent Visible and Infrared Radiation (2013), presents an updated limit in formula 21 on page 88 (or page 18 of the document).